Pelatihan Pembuatan Komik AI dan Dampaknya terhadap Hasil Belajar

Authors

  • Heri Kurnia Universitas Pamulang Author
  • Aeng Muhidin Universitas Pamulang Author
  • Abd. Chaidir Marasabessy Universitas Pamulang Author
  • Ainayya Fathiyyaturrahma Universitas Pamulang Author
  • Zulkarnain Arif Universitas Pamulang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61476/ae5tnm96

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, digital comics, learning materials, learning outcomes, teacher competence

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) creates new opportunities for teachers to design learning materials that are more visual, contextual, and efficient. Digital comics are a promising medium because they integrate text, images, dialogue, and narrative into a coherent learning experience. This Community Service Program (PkM) aimed to improve elementary school teachers’ competence in producing AI-assisted educational comics and to examine their implications for learning-material quality and student learning outcomes. The program was conducted at SDN 01 Pagi on May 23, 2026, involving 10 teachers: six classroom teachers, two subject teachers, and two supporting teachers. The activities consisted of needs identification, conceptual instruction, demonstration, hands-on practice, mentoring, product presentation, and evaluation. Evaluation used pretest-posttest scores, a participant satisfaction questionnaire, and product observation. The mean pretest score increased from 57.2 to 84.6 in the posttest, representing a 27.4-point gain (47.9%). Participant satisfaction reached 92.1%, while the quality of the resulting comic products reached 92.0%. All participants produced at least one AI-assisted digital comic. These results indicate that the training effectively strengthened teachers’ readiness and competence in using AI to develop innovative learning media. However, because the program did not directly measure students’ test scores before and after using the comics, the impact on student learning outcomes should be interpreted as a pedagogical implication supported by previous research rather than direct causal evidence. Further mentoring and classroom trials are recommended to establish stronger evidence of effects on learning outcomes.

References

Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., & others. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative artificial intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15403–15439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

Damopolii, I., Lumembang, T., & İlhan, G. O. (2021). Digital comics in online learning during COVID-19: Its effect on student cognitive learning outcomes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i19.23395

Farinella, M. (2018). The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010401

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Gurl, T. J., Markinson, M. P., & Artzt, A. F. (2024/2025). Using ChatGPT as a lesson planning assistant with preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 11, 114–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00162-9

Hosler, J., & Boomer, K. B. (2011). Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/CBE.10-07-0090

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Matuk, C., Hurwich, T., Spiegel, A., & Diamond, J. (2021). How do teachers use comics to promote engagement, equity, and diversity in science classrooms? Research in Science Education, 51, 685–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9814-8

Powell, W., & Courchesne, S. (2024). Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0305337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305337

Safitri, I. D., Setiawan, B., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). Comics problem-based learning model implementation to improve students’ learning outcomes on heat and its transmission. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 11(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n2.p166-179

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Tristaningrat, A. N., & Ariyana, I. K. S. (2025). The effectiveness of digital comics in improving science learning outcomes and scientific attitudes of fourth-grade elementary students. Journal of Education Technology, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v9i2.98249

van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Wulandari, N. S., & Widodo, S. T. (2024). Enhancing elementary learning with Webtoon-based digital comics. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32608

Yu, C. J. G., & Sumayao, E. D. (2022). Development and implementation of a contextualized comic book to improve students’ conceptions of cell division. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2022.37.2.15

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. HarperCollins.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction (8th ed.). Wiley.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Kurnia, H., Muhidin, A., Marasabessy, A. C., Fathiyyaturrahma, A., & Arif, Z. (2026). Pelatihan Pembuatan Komik AI dan Dampaknya terhadap Hasil Belajar. Kurnia Mengabdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.61476/ae5tnm96